English French|Français German|Deutsch Russian|Русский Spanish|Español Portuguese|Português Italian|Italiano Polish|Polski Dutch|Nederlands Korean|한국어 Chinese|繁體中文 Chinese|简体中文
            
Thread

NHTSA increases roof rigidity requirements

NHTSA increases roof rigidity requirements



Vehicle roof crush standards have not been significantly revised since 1971. The current requirements say one side of a vehicle's roof must support at least 1.5 times the total vehicle weight. However, the strength requirements reach a maximum at 5,000 lbs, whether or not the calculated standard is greater. The regulations also do not apply to convertibles or vehicles weighing more than 6,000 lbs. In 2005, a proposal was created to revise the requirement to 2.5 times the total vehicle weight on one side of the vehicle. Now that proposal has been altered, since NHTSA says it is feasible to distribute the test to press on both sides of a vehicle's roof. It has also been proposed to increase the standards to cover vehicles up to 10,000 lbs. An active rollover test is ruled out though, due to repeatability issues and lack of variable control. To appease Congress, NHTSA must put a revised standard in place by April 2009.

While updating safety standards is always a good thing, the issued statements relating to the proposal leave some questions. It is not stated whether the testing weight cap of 5,000 lbs will be increased along with the maximum tested vehicle weight. These days, many automobiles weigh in at upwards of 4,000 lbs. 2.5 times a 4,000-lb vehicle falls well above the 5,000-pound limit. There is also still no mention of convertible safety. Hopefully the full proposal is more detailed than the points touched upon in this piece.

[Source: Auto News, Sub. Req'd]

Other languages:
English French|Français German|Deutsch Russian|Русский Spanish|Español Portuguese|Português Italian|Italiano Polish|Polski Dutch|Nederlands Korean|한국어 Chinese|繁體中文 Chinese|简体中文
the contents of this automatic machine translation we do not guarantee the accuracy, please visit the English original content.Welcome to AutoMK.com!

Quote Reply TOP

Thread

Tags:

Toyota(358)|Ferrari(105)|Mazda(144)|Nissan(223)|MINI(90)|Porsche(180)|BMW(293)|Mercedes Benz(224)|Honda Cars(271)|Audi(212)|Ford(853)|Lamborghini(66)|Bentley(46)|HUMMER(59)|Supercars(1325)|Chevrolet(299)|Chrysler(337)|DaimlerChrysler(286)|Dodge(218)|GM(644)|GMC(76)|Hyundai(118)|Infiniti(42)|Isuzu(13)|Jaguar(96)|Cadillac(104)|Buick(73)|Bugatti(39)|Frankfurt Auto Show(275)|Geneva Motor Show(240)|LA Auto Show(229)|New York Auto Show(367)|Paris Motor Show(148)|SEMA(373)|Tokyo Motor Show(20)|Misc. Auto Shows(490)|Acura(68)|Aston Martin(134)|Jeep(96)|Kia(68)|Saturn(72)|Scion(45)|SMART(46)|Subaru(84)|Suzuki(59)|Volkswagen(254)|Volvo(102)|World Car News(7453)|RR of the Day(136)|Renault(24)|Saab(74)|Rolls Royce(25)|Land Rover(47)|Lexus(91)|Lincoln(72)|Lotus(59)|Maserati(47)|Maybach(19)|Mercury(48)|Mitsubishi(114)|Pontiac(90)|PSA(38)|Driving(19)|Detroit Auto Show(697)|Lifestyle(0)|Euro(994)|Gadgets(1036)|Garage(465)|Government/Legal(482)|Green(676)|Hirings/Firings(268)|I.C.E.(51)|Japan(324)|Maintenance(293)|Marketing/Advertising(589)|Etc.(2757)|Earnings/Financials(384)|Shelby(0)|motorcycles(4)|Aftermarket(1746)|Auction Action(283)|Audio(111)|Car Buying(2693)|CES(29)|China(224)|Concept Cars(1841)|Contests(137)|Motorsports(2140)|Plants/Manufacturing(609)|Crossovers/CUVs(372)|Economy(929)|Hatchbacks(497)|Hybrids/Alternative(1890)|Minivans/MPVs(446)|Sedans/Saloons(2566)|Sports/GTs(1963)|SUVs(1863)|Trucks/Pickups(866)|Wagons/Estates(476)|Coupes(1801)|Convertibles(1027)|Podcasts(134)|Recalls/TSBs(170)|Safety(305)|Spy Photos(1588)|Tech(445)|Time Warp(562)|Trends(2485)|Tuner Tuesdays(286)|Videos(488)|Commercial Trucks(73)|Chicago Auto Show(310)|
View credits policy

Quick Reply

Options

[ ALT+S for shortcut to submit ]  Preview  Restore  Reset

English French|Français German|Deutsch Russian|Русский Spanish|Español Portuguese|Português Italian|Italiano Polish|Polski Dutch|Nederlands Korean|한국어 Chinese|繁體中文 Chinese|简体中文