Home| English| Español | Français| Deutsch| Русский| Português| Italiano| Polski| العرب Українська| Turkish| Nederlands| 한국어| 日本语| 简体| 繁體

Post New Topic

POLL: 54% of Americans against Cash for Clunkers, 59% expect GM quality to dip under gov't. ownership


POLL: 54% of Americans against Cash for Clunkers, 59% expect GM quality to dip under gov't. ownership

POLL: 54% of Americans against Cash for Clunkers, 59% expect GM quality to dip under gov't. ownership - Car Buying -

America's "Cash for Clunkers" bill is on the cusp of being signed by President Obama, but according to a new survey by Rasmussen Reports, a majority of U.S. citizens aren't in favor of the plan.

According to the telephone survey, fully 54% of those queried are against the measure, while 35% are in favor and 12% aren't sure how they feel about it. That's up from a similar survey done last month, in which just 34% were against consumer vouchers for trading in older, less efficient cars and trucks. In fairness, Rasmussen Reports indicates that the change could have been influenced by a change in the wording of the respective surveys (the initial survey did not indicate how much the program might cost the government).

While that news may not perk up the spirits of Capitol Hill, the survey's findings that 17% of those asked say they are "very likely" to purchase a new vehicle this year because of the program (and a further 18% admit they are somewhat likely) ought to cheer up a few members of Congress.

Perhaps most interesting of all is news that many Americans would appear to have little faith in the ability of the government to help General Motors improve its fortunes, with 41% expecting for GM's quality to deteriorate under federal ownership. (Presumably, this leaves 59% of those surveyed that feel otherwise or are undecided). Perhaps more damaging is that the study's findings say that fully 57% of those questioned believe that the government is likely to pass laws and regulations that give Chrysler and General Motors unfair advantages over other automakers that did not receive bailout funds.

Oddly, Rasmussen Reports' findings to not disclose the number of people it surveyed, or any +/- accuracy estimates. Perhaps one has to have a 'premium membership' to get access to that data. In any case, check out the link for more of the study's findings.


Related Headlines


Other languages:
English| Español | Français| Deutsch| Русский| Português| Italiano| Polski| العرب Українська| Nederlands| Turkish| 한국어| 日本语| 简体| 繁體
the contents of this automatic machine translation we do not guarantee the accuracy, please visit the English original content.Welcome to AutoMK.com!

TOP

Post New Topic

Tags:

Toyota Ferrari Mazda Nissan MINI Porsche BMW Mercedes Benz Honda Cars Audi Ford Lamborghini Bentley World Car News HUMMER Supercars World Car News-A Cadillac Chevrolet Chrysler DaimlerChrysler Dodge GM GMC Hyundai Infiniti Isuzu Buick Bugatti Frankfurt Auto Show Geneva Motor Show LA Auto Show New York Auto Show Paris Motor Show SEMA Tokyo Motor Show Misc. Auto Shows Acura Aston Martin Jaguar Jeep Kia Saturn Scion SMART Subaru Suzuki Volkswagen Volvo RR of the Day Renault Saab Rolls Royce PSA Land Rover Lexus Lincoln Lotus Maserati Maybach Mercury Mitsubishi Pontiac Driving Detroit Auto Show Hot News Gadgets Garage Government/Legal Green Hirings/Firings I.C.E. Japan Maintenance Marketing/Advertising Euro Etc. Earnings/Financials Hot News-A Aftermarket Auction Action Audio Car Buying CES China Concept Cars Contests Motorsports Plants/Manufacturing Podcasts Economy Hatchbacks Hybrids/Alternative Minivans/MPVs Sedans/Saloons Sports/GTs SUVs Trucks/Pickups Wagons/Estates Crossovers/CUVs Coupes Convertibles Recalls/TSBs Safety Spy Photos Tech Time Warp Trends Tuner Tuesdays Videos Commercial Trucks Chicago Auto Show
Visited forums